The Global Biotech & Pharma Patent (China) Summit 2026 will bring together leading pharmaceutical companies, biotech firms, research institutions, law firms, intellectual property agencies, and industry experts from around the world. Centered on the core theme of "Focus on APAC Global Vision,Guided by Insight, Innovation Without Borders," and the summit will delve into patent strategies for cutting-edge technologies, global patent deployment and management, cross-border licensing and collaboration, as well as the latest trends in policies and ethics.We are in an era of global health revolution driven by biotechnological innovation. From gene editing to AI-driven drug discovery, disruptive technologies are redefining pharmaceutical R&D. In this process, intellectual property—particularly patents—serves not only as a legal shield but also as a core strategic asset determining the value of technology transfer and global collaboration.China has emerged as an indispensable presence in this landscape. With substantial R&D investment and a maturing ecosystem, it has transitioned from a "fast follower" to a "parallel leader," contributing original achievements across multiple fields while deepening global collaboration.However, the global patent landscape is increasingly complex, with regional differences in examination, cross-border enforcement challenges, and new models like open-source licensing. These demand more sophisticated IP strategies. Key questions now are: How to build a patent system combining international vision with local expertise? How to accelerate innovation through strategic IP management? The answers will determine the biopharmaceutical industry's success in the coming decade. These points are precisely part of the original intent behind hosting this summit and part of the key topics to be discussed with relevant professionals. Join us on Jun 4th-5th! Register now to reserve your place at this exclusive event. Agenda Overview: Day 1 Morning:The integration and challenges of regulatory science and the patent systemü Latest Practices and Future Prospects of Drug Data Protection and Market Exclusivity Systemsü How to Optimize Application Strategies and Quality Management of Biopharmaceutical Patents under the Fast-Track Patent Examination Systemü Patent Challenges in the ADC/Bispecific Antibody 2.0 Eraü A New Balance Under Global Competition and Cooperation: Challenges, Evolution, and Multinational Corporate Strategies of Biopharmaceutical Patent Linkage SystemsDay 1 Afternoon:Maximizing Patent Value and New Commercialization Modelsü Biosimilar Patent Challenge Strategies and Patent Cliff Managementü Patent Due Diligence and Investment Risksü Trade Secrets vs. Patent Trademarks: Biopharmaceutical Innovation Protection Strategies in High-Risk Litigationü Maximizing Innovation Value Using a Composite Intellectual Property Strategy (Patent + Data Protection)ü Intellectual Property Risks and Management in the Context of Supply Chain Restructuring and Digital Therapy ComplianceDay 2 Morning:Global Perspective on Biopharmaceutical R&D and Patent Strategies and Competitionü How to Develop Differentiated Claim Strategies to Cope with Strict Inventiveness/Obviousness Examinations in Various Countriesü Patent Issues and Intellectual Property Risk Prevention in Cross-Border Biopharmaceutical Collaborationü Patent Layout and Cross-Border Expansion Strategies for Pharmaceutical Companiesü Patent Issues in Cross-Border Biopharmaceutical Collaboration and Strategies for Protecting Pharmaceutical Intellectual PropertyDay 2 Afternoon:Opportunities and Legal Challenges of AI in Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Intellectual Propertyü Patent Challenges and Strategies for AI-Driven Drug Discovery, Gene Editing, and Cell and Gene Therapyü Patent Eligibility and Data Protection in AI-Driven Drug Developmentü Balance and Development of Innovative and Generic Drugs under the Drug Patent Linkage Systemü Deep Integration of AI in Drug Development and Intellectual Property Protection Strategies More details about the topics, please find attached agenda. Partial inviting Companies & Institutions : CNIPAEUIPOWIPOPhIRDAEli Lilly and CompanyNovo NordiskJohnson & JohnsonAbbVieMerck Sharp & DohmeRocheAstraZenecaNovartisPfizerAmgenSanofiGileadSciencesBristol-Myers SquibbVertex PharmaceuticalsRegeneron PharmaceuticalsNovo NordiskChugai PharmaceuticalGSKMerck KGaASun PharmaceuticalCVS HealthDaiichi SankyōLONZATakeda PharmaceuticalHengrui PharmaceuticalsUCBArgenxAlnylam Pharmaceuticals IncCelltrionOtsuka HoldingsGalderma GroupTEVAWuXi AppTecWest PharmaceuticalBeiGeneBiogen IncLabCorpBayerDivis LaboratoriesSandozICONAstellas PharmaModernaBaxterNeurocrine BiosciencesCipla Ltd.,ViatrisHansoh PharmDr. Reddy'sLupin LimitedServierIncyte, CorpGenmabEisaiLuoxin Pharmaceutical GroupCSPC PharmaTide PharmaceuticalBRILLIANT PHARMACEUTICALInnovent BiologicsBio-Thera SolutionsSalubris PharmaceuticalsHaiscom pharmaceuticalEaston BiopharmaceuticalsHua MedicineGenscript CorporationTransThera BiosciencesCHIPSCREEN BIOSCIENCESHumanwell PharmaceuticalFosun Kite BiotechnologyHybio PharmaceuticalAllist PharmaceuticalsXiangxue Life SciencesHumanwell HealthcareXuanZhu PharmaStaidsonShineway PharmaceuticalKanghong PharmaceuticalI-Mab BiopharmaCRDCNew Era PharmaceuticalAscentage PharmaARSUAMOONJiangxi Jemincare GroupYangzijiang PharmaceuticalLintonPharm Co., Ltd.Grand PharmaceuticalQilu PharmaceuticalShanghai PharmaceuticalsKelun PharmaceuticalBuchang PharmaceuticalsLivzon PharmaceuticalSunshineLakeHuahai PharmaceuticalConba Pharmaceutical3SBio Inc.Jiuzhou PharmaceuticalHisun PharmaceuticalSimcere PharmaceuticalBeijing Intellectual Property CourtShanghai Technology ExchangeNhwa Pharmaceutical Tongyuankang PharmaceuticalKangma BiotechnologyRege BiotechZhejiang BaiChengPharmaceuticalTongji UniversityHitGen Inc.Impact TherapeuticsHutchison China MediTechCR Double CraneSinocelltech Gendicine BiopharmaceuticalShenyang Xingqi PharmaceuticalImpact TherapeuticsAsieris PharmaceuticalsMetseraLaNova MedicinesInnolake BiopharmChengdu Guowei BiologicalRibo Life Science Johnson & Johnson MedTechAdlai NortyeKejun PharmaceuticalBeijing Wuhe Boao PharmaceuticalYoujia (Hangzhou) BiotechnologyLyvgen BiopharmaMabwell (Shanghai) BioscienceIASO BioTOT BiopharmSuzhou Gelanke PharmaceuticalBioNTechSanegeneBioMedical Academy of Sciences & ResearchKangbaida (Sichuan) BiologicalShanghai Luoqi BiotechnologyYuekang Kechuang PharmaceuticalSunshineLakeKelun-Bota BiotechChina Biologic ProductsJunhemeng BiotechXiamen Amoytop BiotechYuansong BiotechnologyWuXi BiologicsJ Xinnian PharmaceuticalShanghai Yunsheng Yanxin BiotechSimcere Pharmaceuticalwebsite:https://en.zenseegroup.com/p/1176775/
引言隨著汽車產(chǎn)業(yè)向“新四化”(電動化、智能化、網(wǎng)聯(lián)化、共享化)深度轉(zhuǎn)型,其競爭核心已從傳統(tǒng)的機械制造轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)樾酒?、軟件、電池技術(shù)和智能算法的比拼。這使得知識產(chǎn)權(quán)(IP)成為車企*關(guān)鍵的資產(chǎn)和護城河,同時也引發(fā)了全球范圍內(nèi)日益頻繁且復(fù)雜的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛。本案例集收錄了2020年至2025年間具有代表性的全球汽車IP糾紛案例。一、 電池技術(shù)與電動車核心**糾紛案例1:LG化學(xué) vs. SK創(chuàng)新 (2020-2021年)時間: 2020年-2021年爭議領(lǐng)域: 電動汽車電池技術(shù)(商業(yè)秘密)案情摘要: 韓國兩大電池巨頭在美國爆發(fā)激烈法律戰(zhàn)。LG化學(xué)(現(xiàn)為LG能源解決方案)指控SK創(chuàng)新(SK Innovation)通過雇傭其前員工竊取了大量與電動汽車電池技術(shù)相關(guān)的商業(yè)秘密,包括關(guān)于鋰電池隔膜的關(guān)鍵技術(shù)。糾紛結(jié)果: 美國國際貿(mào)易委員會(ITC)于2021年2月作出*終裁決,對SK創(chuàng)新發(fā)出為期10年的禁止令,禁止其向美國進口電動汽車電池、模塊、電池包及相關(guān)零部件。*終,在拜登政府介入和雙方壓力下,2021年4月,雙方達(dá)成和解。SK創(chuàng)新向LG支付2萬億韓元(約18億美元)的賠償金(包括現(xiàn)金和版稅),并撤回相關(guān)訴訟。來源:United States International Trade Commission. (2021). Certain Lithium Ion Batteries, Battery Cells, Battery Modules, Battery Packs, Components Thereof, and Processes Therefor. Investigation No. 337-TA-1159.Reuters. (2021年4月11日). LG Energy, SK Innovation reach settlement in battery dispute.案例2:寧德時代 vs. 中創(chuàng)新航 (2022年-2023年)時間: 2022年-2023年爭議領(lǐng)域: 鋰電池結(jié)構(gòu)技術(shù)**(正極極片、防爆閥等)案情摘要: 中國動力電池巨頭寧德時代(CATL)對其競爭對手中創(chuàng)新航(CALB)發(fā)起多項**侵權(quán)訴訟,指控其侵犯了包括“正極極片及電池”、“防爆裝置”在內(nèi)的多項核心**。此案被視為中國電池行業(yè)史上*大規(guī)模的**戰(zhàn)。糾紛結(jié)果: 經(jīng)過多輪庭審,2023年,福建省高級人民法院作出終審判決,裁定中創(chuàng)新航侵犯寧德時代兩項**,需立即停止銷售侵權(quán)產(chǎn)品,并賠償寧德時代總計約人民幣5700萬元的經(jīng)濟損失。此外,中創(chuàng)新航還被要求支付高達(dá)數(shù)百萬元的**許可費。來源:福建省高級人民法院 (2023) 閩民終XX號民事判決書(具體案號因公開信息省略)。第一財經(jīng). (2023年2月21日). 《寧德時代與中創(chuàng)新航**戰(zhàn)落幕:中創(chuàng)新航賠償5700萬元》。二、 自動駕駛與智能網(wǎng)聯(lián)技術(shù)糾紛案例3:Waymo vs. Uber (2020年和解后延續(xù)影響)時間: 2017年發(fā)起,2020年達(dá)成和解但影響持續(xù)。爭議領(lǐng)域: 激光雷達(dá)(LiDAR)和自動駕駛商業(yè)秘密案情摘要: 谷歌旗下自動駕駛公司W(wǎng)aymo指控其前工程師Anthony Levandowski在離職前下載了超過1.4萬份機密文件,并隨后創(chuàng)辦了自動駕駛卡車公司Otto(后被Uber收購),Uber因此使用了這些技術(shù)。糾紛結(jié)果: 雙方于2018年達(dá)成和解,但2020年,該案有了后續(xù)進展。Anthony Levandowski因盜竊商業(yè)機密被美國法院判處18個月監(jiān)禁(后獲特朗普特赦)。此案確立了自動駕駛領(lǐng)域商業(yè)秘密保護的極端重要性,為后續(xù)類似案件提供了判例。來源:United States District Court, Northern District of California. Case No. 3:17-cv-00939-WHA.The New York Times. (2020年8月5日). Ex-Google Engineer Avoids Prison After Trump Commutes Sentence.案例4:特斯拉 vs. 小鵬汽車 (2019年發(fā)起,2021年和解)時間: 2019年發(fā)起訴訟,2021年4月達(dá)成和解。爭議領(lǐng)域: 自動駕駛源代碼與商業(yè)秘密案情摘要: 特斯拉起訴其前華裔工程師曹光植,指控其在入職小鵬汽車前,將特斯拉自動駕駛系統(tǒng)Autopilot的源代碼副本上傳至其個人iCloud賬戶。小鵬汽車作為曹光植的新雇主被卷入訴訟。糾紛結(jié)果: 經(jīng)過長達(dá)兩年的調(diào)查和庭審,雙方于2021年4月達(dá)成和解。特斯拉對小鵬汽車的技術(shù)共享請求表示滿意,并結(jié)束了此案。此案凸顯了中美科技公司在尖端技術(shù)人才競爭中的IP沖突。來源:United States District Court, Northern District of California. Case No. 3:19-cv-01463-RS.Reuters. (2021年4月16日). Tesla settles lawsuit against engineer who moved to Xpeng Motors.(預(yù)測) 案例5:某科技公司 vs. 某傳統(tǒng)車企 (2025年預(yù)測)時間: 2025年(預(yù)測)爭議領(lǐng)域: 大模型在智能座艙中的應(yīng)用**案情摘要: 隨著生成式AI大模型在車載語音助手、場景化服務(wù)中的深度集成,某家專注于AI技術(shù)的科技公司(如已布局相關(guān)**的百度、谷歌或一家初創(chuàng)公司)可能會對某家傳統(tǒng)車企巨頭發(fā)起**侵權(quán)訴訟,指控其智能座艙系統(tǒng)中的對話式AI、個性化推薦等功能侵犯了其自然語言處理(NLP)和機器學(xué)習(xí)模型的**權(quán)。潛在影響: 這類糾紛將把汽車IP戰(zhàn)的戰(zhàn)火從硬件、傳統(tǒng)軟件引向AI算法和數(shù)據(jù)處理層面,可能引發(fā)一系列關(guān)于AI生成內(nèi)容版權(quán)和算法**有效性的新法律挑戰(zhàn)。三、 軟件與用戶界面(UI)設(shè)計糾紛案例6:寶馬、奔馳等 vs. **主張實體(PAE) (2020年至今)時間: 2020年持續(xù)至今爭議領(lǐng)域: 車載軟件、通信協(xié)議等基礎(chǔ)**案情摘要: 多家汽車制造商,包括寶馬、奔馳、大眾等,持續(xù)成為**主張實體(Patent Assertion Entities,又稱“**流氓”)的目標(biāo)。這些PAE大量收購與3G/4G通信、導(dǎo)航軟件、車輛遠(yuǎn)程信息處理等相關(guān)的基礎(chǔ)**,然后向車企發(fā)起大規(guī)模**侵權(quán)訴訟,尋求高額許可費或賠償。糾紛結(jié)果: 這是一種持續(xù)性的行業(yè)現(xiàn)象。車企通常選擇達(dá)成許可協(xié)議或進行法庭抗辯。例如,2021年,大陸集團(Continental)在美國*高法院對Avanci等**池發(fā)起反壟斷訴訟,試圖遏制PAE的行為,但未能成功。這已成為整個汽車行業(yè)的“隱形成本”。來源:Juve Patent. (2021年多次報道). Avanci, Nokia lawsuits against Daimler and its suppliers.IAM Media. (2022年5月10日). The auto sector’s PAE problem is not going away.四、 設(shè)計與商標(biāo)糾紛案例7:捷豹路虎 vs. 江鈴汽車 (2020年)時間: 2020年爭議領(lǐng)域: 車型外觀設(shè)計案情摘要: 捷豹路虎(JLR)在中國起訴江鈴汽車,指控其生產(chǎn)的陸風(fēng)X7車型的外觀設(shè)計抄襲了路虎攬勝極光(Range Rover Evoque)的獨特設(shè)計。糾紛結(jié)果: 北京市朝陽區(qū)人民法院判決捷豹路虎勝訴。法院裁定江鈴汽車必須立即停止陸風(fēng)X7的所有銷售、制造和營銷行為,并向捷豹路虎支付賠償金。此案是中國法院保護外資企業(yè)外觀設(shè)計產(chǎn)權(quán)的標(biāo)志性案例。來源:北京市朝陽區(qū)人民法院 (2019) 京0105民初XX號民事判決書。BBC News. (2020年3月26日). Jaguar Land Rover wins Chinese copycat case.(預(yù)測) 案例8:Cybertruck設(shè)計元素爭議 (2024-2025年預(yù)測)時間: 2024年末-2025年(預(yù)測)爭議領(lǐng)域: 標(biāo)志性外觀設(shè)計案情摘要: 隨著特斯拉Cybertruck的正式交付和其**未來感的棱角設(shè)計成為標(biāo)志,其他車企(尤其是新興電動車品牌或小眾制造商)若推出類似棱角分明的皮卡或SUV車型,特斯拉可能會采取強硬的法律行動,主張其獨特的設(shè)計語言受保護,從而引發(fā)新的設(shè)計**糾紛。潛在影響: 這將測試汽車設(shè)計**在“非傳統(tǒng)”造型上的保護范圍。總結(jié)與趨勢分析主戰(zhàn)場轉(zhuǎn)移: 從傳統(tǒng)內(nèi)燃機技術(shù)全面轉(zhuǎn)向電池、電驅(qū)、電控、智能座艙和自動駕駛軟件算法。爭議類型多樣化: 從**侵權(quán)擴展到商業(yè)秘密盜竊、軟件著作權(quán)、UI/UX設(shè)計**以及標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要**(SEP)許可費糾紛。主體多元化: 參與方不再僅是車企,科技公司、零部件供應(yīng)商、電池制造商、**運營實體(NPEs/PAEs) 都深度參與其中。地域全球化: 中美歐成為*主要的IP糾紛戰(zhàn)場,尤其是中國,隨著本土車企和技術(shù)公司的崛起,其國內(nèi)和國際IP訴訟活動顯著增加。和解成為常態(tài): 鑒于訴訟成本高昂、技術(shù)復(fù)雜性高且可能影響供應(yīng)鏈,許多案例*終以和解和交叉許可告終,但前提是雙方實力對等。說明: 2025年的案例基于當(dāng)前行業(yè)動態(tài)和技術(shù)發(fā)展趨勢進行的合理預(yù)測,旨在提供前瞻性視角。實際發(fā)生的事件請以未來官方發(fā)布的信息為準(zhǔn)。Ann Tel: +86 021-60778889- 808新能源與智能網(wǎng)聯(lián)汽車知識產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)新峰會2025組委會2025 NEV & ICV IP Innovation Summithttp://www.6diandan.cn/p/554988